We want to comply with Criterion 31 by using our MOC tracking system to help learners track what they need to maintain their certification and offer suggestions - would this be compliant?
While the MOC tracking system is useful, it doesn't meet the requirements/intent of C31. The bigger idea is for the provider and the learner to develop a learning plan with individualized feedback that will help the learner to address their own personal practice gaps - those areas of knowledge, skill, or performance that need improvement. The provider would also be required to demonstrate that the learning plan differs meaningfully between learners.
Could my organization comply with C30 by optimizing NON-clinical skills? Or does it have to be technical/procedural skills only?
A provider could be compliant with C30 by optimizing skills like quality improvement in their learners as long as the skill is an "observable psychomotor skill" that requires both practice and expertise.
